Home

Email

Officers

Grievances

Studies/scholarships

31620 23rd Ave. South,  Suite 304 Federal Way, WA 98003, 1-800-468-3856

Nebulous Ruling by Nursing QA Commission

By Kirk S. Bond, Attorney for UFCW 141

I recently represented a registered nurse who had been charged by the Nursing Care Quality Assurance Commission with patient abuse. The Commission alleged that my client abused the patient by "striking the patient in the chest, knocking the patient down into the bed, and by speaking to the patient in a disrespectful manner." The evidence presented at hearing, however, did not support the allegations.

Accordingly, the Commission found that "insufficient evidence was presented to support the allegation regarding striking and knocking [the patient] down into his bed, and therefore those charges are dismissed." Rather than dismissing the charges in their entirety, though, the Commission held that my client committed "abuse of a patient" by speaking to the patient "in a disrespectful manner."

The patient to whom my client allegedly spoke in a disrespectful manner was an 87 year old male who had been admitted to the intensive care unit of the hospital after suffering a subarachnoid hemorrhage and fractured hip during a fall. As the Commission concluded, the patient was "frequently confused and disoriented with periods of delirium and aggressiveness" and was "hard of hearing." The patient had an IV line, a urine catheter, a cranial shunt and his physician had ordered soft wrist restraints to protect him from harming himself or others.

As my client walked by the patient's room one day, he noticed the patient flailing his arms and trying to sit up. Concerned that the patient would pull out a tube or otherwise harm himself, my client approached the patient and tried to calm him. Knowing that the patient was hard of hearing, my client yelled in a loud voice, "stop it, stop it." Although the evidence on this next point was contradictory, based on the testimony of one witness the Commission concluded that my client yelled, "stop it, stop it, old man."

The Commission determined that my client's supposed use of the term "old man" was "very inappropriate and demeaning" to the patient and that, even though the patient was hard of hearing, the tone and volume that my client used was inappropriate. According to the Commission, my client should have used "a gentler tone and volume to help the patient orient himself and calm down." Because of its conclusion, the Commission suspended my client's license for one year, but stayed the suspension upon his compliance with certain terms and conditions.

The Commission's Order in this case could have enormous impact upon the practice of nursing. The Commission decided that talking to a patient in what it deems an "inappropriate" or "disrespectful" manner is "abuse of a patient."

If this is the state of the law in Washington, it is conceivable that nurses licensed here place their licenses at risk if they call a patient, "honey," "dear," "grandpa," "young lady," "buddy" or any other term that the Commission in a given case unilaterally determines is inappropriate. Likewise, the Commission could possibly take action against the license of a registered nurse who uses in an emergency situation a tone or volume of voice that the Commission after the fact determines was "inappropriate."

While few would disagree with the view that all health care professionals should aspire to treat patients appropriately and respectfully, the Commission's Order in this case should frighten all registered nurses. Depending on the circumstances, calling an 87 year old man an "old man" could be considered "inappropriate." Inappropriate behavior, though, is not patient abuse.

By interchangeably using the terms "inappropriate" and "abusive," the Commission has imposed a nebulous standard upon nurses in which it is imaginable that a nurse places her license at risk if she fails on a particularly bad morning to take the appropriate and respectful action of greeting each patient with a warm smile.

On behalf of my client, I have appealed the Commission's Order in this case to the Superior Court for the state of Washington. I will update the status of this case in a later issue of Vital Signs.

 

 

United Food & Commercial Workers International Union